Xuggle 5.4 may not be necessary, but I think lwjgl 2.8.3 is a must - Printable Version +- EmuNewz Network (https://www.emunewz.net/forum) +-- Forum: PSP Emulation (https://www.emunewz.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=191) +--- Forum: JPCSP Official Forum (https://www.emunewz.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=51) +---- Forum: General discussion (https://www.emunewz.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=57) +---- Thread: Xuggle 5.4 may not be necessary, but I think lwjgl 2.8.3 is a must (/showthread.php?tid=54378) |
Xuggle 5.4 may not be necessary, but I think lwjgl 2.8.3 is a must - freefive - 05-24-2012 Seems that it had fixed lots of issues of opengl and shader on both AMD and NV, added some opengl 3 support for Mac and opengl 4 on other platform. With it, maybe we can fix some display problems or enhance the performance of graphic rendering...I don't know Maybe it's high time we updated some libraries RE: Xuggle 5.4 may not be necessary, but I think lwjgl 2.8.3 is a must - gid15 - 05-24-2012 From the release notes between 2.7.1 and 2.8.3, there is no fix in the functions used by Jpcsp. Excepted maybe for MacOSX where the description is just "fix: Compatibility issue with OSX 10.5 and below". Have you tried upgrading the LWJGL jar's and dll's in the current Jpcsp release for regression testing? RE: Xuggle 5.4 may not be necessary, but I think lwjgl 2.8.3 is a must - freefive - 05-24-2012 too bad Not yet fully tested, I tested win32 with just a few games I have and no obvious change. However, I haven't tested on my OS 10.5. If it comes out just like the case of xuggle5.4, then just leave it alone... Just thinking that maybe jpcsp for windows and linux can have opengl 4.2 support or other features through the latest lwjgl and thus improve or fix some rendering issue, like great knight history or so But I'm not good at compiling java, I only know a little about C++... RE: Xuggle 5.4 may not be necessary, but I think lwjgl 2.8.3 is a must - gid15 - 05-24-2012 (05-24-2012, 09:00 AM)freefive Wrote: too badThis is excellent if you have a Mac OS! It would be very interesting to test the new versions on it. We have very little Mac OS testers... RE: Xuggle 5.4 may not be necessary, but I think lwjgl 2.8.3 is a must - freefive - 05-24-2012 But its display card is ati radeon hd 2600 pro, and you know ati(amd) doesn't publish drivers for mac and even apple itself releases drivers next to never So when I get black screen --almost all games except cube sample-- I can't figure out whether it is the openGL problem or the driver problem RE: Xuggle 5.4 may not be necessary, but I think lwjgl 2.8.3 is a must - gid15 - 05-24-2012 (05-24-2012, 09:50 AM)freefive Wrote: But its display card is ati radeon hd 2600 pro, and you know ati(amd) doesn't publish drivers for mac and even apple itself releases drivers next to neverYou could try the software rendering in the Jpcsp video options. It is quite slow, but you should be able to see something... RE: Xuggle 5.4 may not be necessary, but I think lwjgl 2.8.3 is a must - freefive - 05-24-2012 lol I can enable the software renderer by editing the settings.properties, though, but with software renderer enabled jpcsp can't even run cube sample.... RE: Xuggle 5.4 may not be necessary, but I think lwjgl 2.8.3 is a must - gid15 - 05-24-2012 (05-24-2012, 10:55 AM)freefive Wrote: lolDisable all the other video options when enabling software rendering... RE: Xuggle 5.4 may not be necessary, but I think lwjgl 2.8.3 is a must - freefive - 05-24-2012 same Ok, I am giving up.. |