This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.
EmuNewz Network › Official Boards for Emunews Affiliated Emu Projects › Official RPCS3 Forum [archive] › RPCS3 - General Discussion v
Why SSSE3 only?

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Linear Mode
Why SSSE3 only?
ssshadow Offline
rpcs3 team member
Posts: 2,485
Threads: 77
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 32
#11
07-07-2017, 08:24 PM (This post was last modified: 07-07-2017, 08:25 PM by ssshadow.)
(07-07-2017, 09:55 AM)OSad Wrote: Hey, hijacking the thread for a related question:

I was thinking about getting a Ryzen chip as a physical core number upgrade to my current Intel processor, and as I was checking some comparison pages, I noticed that AMD's offerings have way less instruction sets than Intel's.

[Image: 4d0d2e5963.png]

I'm no computer expert so I can't even begin to assume how much of an impact this stuff has. Are they necessary to emulator operation? I assume things run more smoothly when you have access to them...

Whatever site that is, never ever use it again. For example MMX has existed in every x86 CPU since like 1995.

Ryzen has every important CPU extension that any modern CPU should have.
Asus N55SF, i7-2670QM (~2,8 ghz under typical load), GeForce GT 555M (only OpenGL)
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Why SSSE3 only? - by truthfinder - 04-26-2017, 02:07 PM
RE: Why SSSE3 only? - by ssshadow - 04-26-2017, 05:33 PM
RE: Why SSSE3 only? - by cgerrr - 05-04-2017, 11:52 AM
RE: Why SSSE3 only? - by Annie - 05-04-2017, 01:06 PM
RE: Why SSSE3 only? - by logan - 05-05-2017, 03:02 PM
RE: Why SSSE3 only? - by Annie - 05-05-2017, 03:16 PM
RE: Why SSSE3 only? - by logan - 05-07-2017, 12:35 PM
RE: Why SSSE3 only? - by evilpaul - 05-13-2017, 05:29 AM
RE: Why SSSE3 only? - by OSad - 07-07-2017, 09:55 AM
RE: Why SSSE3 only? - by ssshadow - 07-07-2017, 08:24 PM
RE: Why SSSE3 only? - by ps0ne - 07-07-2017, 03:21 PM
RE: Why SSSE3 only? - by OSad - 07-07-2017, 10:47 PM
RE: Why SSSE3 only? - by ssshadow - 07-12-2017, 11:17 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)