![]() |
NVIDIA CUDA for JPCSP - worth it? - Printable Version +- EmuNewz Network (https://www.emunewz.net/forum) +-- Forum: PSP Emulation (https://www.emunewz.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=191) +--- Forum: JPCSP Official Forum (https://www.emunewz.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=51) +---- Forum: svn trunk discussion (https://www.emunewz.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=56) +---- Thread: NVIDIA CUDA for JPCSP - worth it? (/showthread.php?tid=3303) |
NVIDIA CUDA for JPCSP - worth it? - BlackDaemon - 01-09-2011 Looked on google for "JVM CUDA" and got this - JCUDA. Just wondering, could this increase emulation performance? ![]() RE: NVIDIA CUDA for JPCSP - worth it? - Darth1701 - 01-09-2011 (01-09-2011, 03:38 PM)BlackDaemon Wrote: Looked on google for "JVM CUDA" and got this - JCUDA. Just wondering, could this increase emulation performance? Or this: http://www.jocl.org/ for both Nvidia and AMD ![]() ![]() RE: NVIDIA CUDA for JPCSP - worth it? - Hykem - 01-09-2011 Hmm, intersting... ![]() Although it could really help wrapping up a few things and provide better code, I'm afraid this could only be a valid option if we only supported NVIDIA cards alone. Binding JPCSP to work with JCUDA needs some code rewriting take may be useless if we end up restricting our portability. ![]() Nonetheless, I believe it could improve the overall performance significantly depending on the way we used the APIs. EDIT: @Darth1701: The latest version of LWJGL seems to also provide some wrappers for OpenCL, but I haven't tested that fully. ![]() RE: NVIDIA CUDA for JPCSP - worth it? - Orphis - 01-09-2011 Sorry, but I don't quite see any valid use case for Cuda or OpenCL in Jpcsp. It won't help at all ! |