This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Xuggle 5.4 may not be necessary, but I think lwjgl 2.8.3 is a must
#4
(05-24-2012, 09:00 AM)freefive Wrote: too bad
Not yet fully tested, I tested win32 with just a few games I have and no obvious change. However, I haven't tested on my OS 10.5.

If it comes out just like the case of xuggle5.4, then just leave it alone... Just thinking that maybe jpcsp for windows and linux can have opengl 4.2 support or other features through the latest lwjgl and thus improve or fix some rendering issue, like great knight history or so

But I'm not good at compiling java, I only know a little about C++...Tongue
This is excellent if you have a Mac OS! It would be very interesting to test the new versions on it. We have very little Mac OS testers...
Always include a complete log file at INFO level in your reports. Thanks! How to post a log
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Xuggle 5.4 may not be necessary, but I think lwjgl 2.8.3 is a must - by gid15 - 05-24-2012, 09:36 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)